Your firm's image may not necessarily reflect who you are.
Your image and reputation exist, whether you’ve built them or not. The question is: who shapes them?
For generations, a reputation for managing large fortunes has been built quietly. Clients came through referrals. Relationships were passed down from one generation to the next within established circles of trust. Discretion was not just a preference. It was a competitive advantage. That model has not disappeared. But it is no longer sufficient on its own.
« “$124 trillion is expected to pass from baby boomers to the next generation by 2048.” »
$124 trillion is expected to pass from baby boomers to the next generation by 2048. This is not some distant projection. This shift is already underway.
The people who inherit this wealth are different from those who built it. They were born in the digital age. They are guided by their values. They are accustomed to researching, comparing, and forming their own opinions online before making any major decision—including choosing whom to entrust with their wealth.
They will most likely switch advisors. And when they do, they won’t start with a phone call or a referral. They’ll search online. They’ll want proof that a firm’s values align with their own. They’ll form an opinion long before their first conversation.
For most wealth management firms and family offices, this search will yield no results. Or worse, it will return an image that does not reflect their actual situation.
It's not a marketing issue
This is where most firms misdiagnose the situation.
The instinct is to treat digital invisibility as a marketing problem. To commission a website refresh, post more on LinkedIn, or hire an agency to run campaigns.
But the underlying issue is not marketing. It is governance and perception.
The issue isn’t about increasing visibility. It’s about understanding how a firm—with its history, reputation, and long-standing relationships—should be perceived in a digital environment without compromising the discretion that defines it.
This is a different kind of issue. It requires a different approach.
The risk goes both ways
The risk of invisibility
Firms that gain visibility for the wrong reasons expose themselves to another risk. Content that is perceived as promotional, generic, or disconnected from their true identity undermines the credibility it is meant to reinforce. In a world built on trust, a poorly executed digital presence can do more harm than no presence at all.
The risk of poor visibility
Firms that gain visibility for the wrong reasons expose themselves to another risk. Content that is perceived as promotional, generic, or disconnected from their true identity undermines the credibility it is meant to reinforce. In a world built on trust, a poorly executed digital presence can do more harm than no presence at all.
3 Key Questions
-
What does your digital presence say today, and does it accurately reflect the firm’s values, DNA, and long-term vision?
-
How should the firm engage with the next generation of family members, stakeholders, and prospective clients—people who will form their opinions online before ever meeting in person?
-
Where, how, and to what extent should the firm maintain an online presence, and what safeguards should be put in place to ensure confidentiality?
Nicole Booth, Rise Digital